Conteúdo do artigo principal

Publicado:
dez 11, 2020
Palavras-chave:
exposure, naturalistic setting, second language acquisition

Resumo

It is widely agreed that the process of learning a second language involves exposure to the target language (Ellis, 1997; Lightbown & Spada, 1999; Saville-Troike, 2012). One of the settings where exposure occurs is the natural setting. Natural acquisition contexts or naturalistic settings are defined as environments where learners are exposed to the target language in their daily activities (Lightbown & Spada, 1999). The benefits of these contexts are that learners are provided with a wide variety of communicative instances as the target language is used as the default language resulting in encounters with different types of inputs (Lightbown & Spada, 1999). This study reports the findings from a two-week study of target language exposure experienced by two Chilean postgraduate students at a New Zealand university. Exposure was recorded and measured using a Google log diary, based and adapted from Ranta and Meckleborg’s study (2013). Results show a tendency for participants to be involved in receptive communicative instances rather than productive and a predominant use of their L1 in oral interaction. The study discusses some of the reasons why participants did not engage in more oral interaction in English within this naturalistic setting and why their L1s were predominant in oral interactions.

Joaquín Eguren Álvarez
Como Citar
Eguren Álvarez, J. (2020). Measuring language use and exposure in a naturalistic setting. Contextos: Estudios De Humanidades Y Ciencias Sociales, (47). Recuperado de https://revistas.umce.cl/index.php/contextos/article/view/1581

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Bochner, S., Hutnik, N., & Furnham, A. (1985). The friendship patterns of overseas and host students in an Oxford student residence. Journal of Social Psychology, 125(6), 689-694.

Bretch, R, & Robinson, J. (1993). Qualitative analysis of second language acquisition in study abroad: The ACTR/NFLC Project. NFLC Occasional Papers, August. Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.

Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (Second Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom Interaction, Comprehension, and the Acquisition of L2 Word Meanings. Language Learning, 44(3), pp.449-491.

Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, Interaction, and Second Language Production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(3), pp.283 - 302.

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction, pp. 175-199.

Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (2009). Second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.

Kaplan, M (1989). French in the community: A survey of language used abroad. French Review (Deddington), 63, 290 – 299.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. Torrance, CA: Laredo Pub. Co.

Lightbown, P. and Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.

Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible Input and Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(03), pp.303-323.

McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Arnold.

Pica, T., Young, R. & Doughty, C. (1987). The Impact of Interaction on Comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), pp.737-758.

Ranta, L. & Meckelborg, A. (2013). How Much Exposure to English Do International Graduate Students Really Get? Measuring Language Use in a Naturalistic Setting. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(1), pp.1-33.

Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (1996). Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Academic Press.

Saville-Troike, M. (2012). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Detalhes do artigo

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)